```markdown
### Overall Summary
文档阐明了当多个 Hook 匹配同一事件时的执行顺序与结果合并机制，明确指出所有匹配的 Hook 都会执行完毕，而不会因某个 Hook 返回 `deny` 而提前终止，并新增了日志记录与拦截并行的具体示例。
### Key Themes across pages
* **全量执行模式**：更正了潜在误解，强调即使一个 Hook 返回 `deny` 阻止了操作，其他并行的 Hook 仍会继续运行直至完成。
* **副作用处理**：明确指出 Hook 的副作用（如写入日志、修改状态）无法通过其他 Hook 的拒绝指令来抑制，这要求开发者确保 Hook 逻辑的独立性。
* **结果合并策略**：重申了决策类结果的优先级（`deny` > `ask` > `allow`），以及上下文信息的聚合方式。
### Impact level
**Medium** (中等)
该变更修正了开发者对 Hook 执行流的潜在假设。虽然代码行为未变，但文档明确指出了无法利用“拒绝”状态来“短路”其他 Hook 的执行，这对于设计包含副作用（如审计日志）的 Hook 逻辑至关重要。
### Action items for developers
1. **审查 Hook 幂等性**：确保你的 Hook 脚本支持并发执行，且不依赖其他 Hook 的失败来停止自身的运行。
2. **避免依赖短路逻辑**：不要假设一个拦截 Hook 能阻止其他 Hook（如日志 Hook）产生副作用。
3. **利用审计特性**：基于此行为，可以放心地添加日志记录 Hook，因为即使操作最终被 `deny`，审计日志仍能被记录下来。
```
💭 Model Reasoning
1. **Understand the Goal**: The user wants a concise, insightful analysis of documentation changes related to a `hooks-guide.md` file. The analysis needs to be in Chinese, focusing on what matters to developers.
2. **Analyze the Input**:
* **File**: `hooks-guide.md`
* **Changes**: +8 lines added, -1 line removed (net +7, though the diff shows a larger block because of the reformatting/move).
* **Original Text**: A paragraph explaining how multiple hooks work (most restrictive answer wins, `deny` cancels calls, `ask` forces prompts, `additionalContext` is aggregated).
* **New Text**:
* Kept the list of hook types.
* Added a new section: "Combine results from multiple hooks".
* Clarified execution model: *All* matching hooks run to completion, even if one returns `deny`. This is a crucial distinction from the previous text which implied `deny` "cancels the tool call" (perhaps implying immediate termination of others, though the old text actually said "One hook returning `deny` cancels the tool call no matter what the others return", it didn't explicitly say the *others* stop running).
* Added a concrete JSON example: Two hooks for `Bash` (one logging, one blocking `rm -rf`).
* Explained the outcome: Both run, logging succeeds, blocking denies the final action.
3. **Synthesize the Analysis**:
* **Overall Summary**: The documentation now explicitly clarifies that multiple matching hooks all run to completion before results are merged, rather than stopping execution on the first failure. It includes a concrete example of combining logging and blocking hooks.
* **Key Themes**:
* *Execution Semantics*: Clarified that hooks are not "short-circuited" by a `deny` result. They all run.
* *Side Effects*: Important for developers relying on side effects (like logging). If a hook denies, others still run (e.g., you can still log a denied command).
* *Precedence Rules*: Reiteration that `deny` > `ask` > `allow`.
* **Impact Level**: **Medium**. This clarifies behavior that developers might have misunderstood. If a developer thought returning `deny` in the first hook would stop the second hook from running (e.g., preventing a redundant check), this change corrects that assumption. It's not breaking code, but it changes the mental model of hook execution.
* **Action Items**:
* Review hook configurations to ensure idempotency (since they all run).
* Avoid relying on one hook to prevent side effects of another (e.g., if one hook sets a flag that another might interpret wrongly).
* Ensure hook scripts are safe to run in parallel/concurrently if they are independent.
* Refactor if you previously assumed early exit behavior.
4. **Drafting the Response (in Chinese)**:
* *Summary*: 文档更新了“合并多个 Hook 结果”的部分，阐明了当多个 Hook 匹配同一事件时，它们都会执行完毕后再合并结果，且提供了一个具体的 JSON 示例。
* *Themes*:
* 执行顺序与并发：明确了所有匹配的 Hook 都会运行完毕，不会因为某个 Hook 返回 `deny` 而终止其他 Hook。
* 副作用处理：强调了 Hook 的副作用（如日志记录）依然会发生，即使最终操作被拒绝。
* 结果合并策略：重申了最严格的限制优先（`deny` > `ask` > `allow`）。
* *Impact*: **Medium**. 这澄清了潜在的误解。开发者不能依赖某个 Hook 的拒绝动作来阻止其他 Hook 执行（例如防止副作用或重复处理）。
* *Action Items*:
* 检查现有的 Hook 脚本，确保它们可以独立运行且不会被其他 Hook 的结果影响。
* 不要依赖“短路”逻辑来阻止其他 Hook 的执行（如记录日志的操作总是会执行）。
* 理解日志记录等副作用在操作被拒绝时依然会保留。
5. **Refining the Response**: Make it crisp and professional. Use the requested format.
* *Drafting Action Items*:
1. 确保你的 Hook 脚本支持并发执行或独立运行，因为拒绝指令不会阻断其他 Hook 的执行。
2. 检查是否存在依赖其他 Hook 结果的逻辑，避免因为全量执行导致的预期外副作用。
3. 利用这一特性，可以放心地添加日志类 Hook，即使安全类 Hook 拒绝了操作，日志依然会被记录。
6. **Final Polish (Self-Correction)**:
* Wait, the original text said "When multiple hooks match, each one returns its own result." but the *interpretation* of "One hook returning `deny` cancels the tool call" might have led devs to think the *execution chain* stops. The new text explicitly says "Don't rely on one hook's `deny` to suppress side effects in another hook." This is the key insight.
* Impact is Medium because it corrects a behavioral assumption.
7. **Final Output Generation**: (Proceed to generate markdown).